It looks good Craig my friend
![[:Y:]](./images/smilies/smiley20.gif "Thumbs Up")
![[clap]](./images/smilies/smiley32.gif "adulations")
Good observation on the stiffness of the Adi. The first couple Adi tops that I worked with were very wimpy in comparison to what I use these days. So I did not know if this was what to expect generally speaking. You will figure it out though as you handle more tops and have more completed guitars to reference in terms of results.
You did a good job of carving triangular shapes but some of the braces look higher than they need to be to me. I would reduce more height at the X intersection and taper more away after that in all directions. The tone bars look high to me too - better have some Doritos on hand for them.....
With no deflection testing data or method .125 is probably a good number for WRC.
Lastly why the duality of upper transverse brace - is that a Jungian thing?
Overall the top looks a bit over braced for my liking but this is what we all tend to do on the early guitars and it's really the problem to have because it can be easily corrected if you wish to do so. In your case the issue, IMHO, is the height of the braces and not the width - very easy to correct.
Nice job!
. I must add that this is a true flat-top. No radius at all on the top. I understand you can go lighter with the added strength of a 28ft radius. Please correct me if my logic is flawed . The double upper transverse bracing is an Olsen copy. I will probably do away with this down the track.
But it didn't - I am sorry to say...... 
I guess I'll find out once I string it up.