Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Mar 02, 2025 6:22 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:54 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:09 pm
Posts: 163
Location: Australia
I have braced my back as per the scott antes plans spec but have read on numerous threads that the top bracing is on the heavy side and not very close to the old martin spec on these particular OM plans...
I'm just wondering if anyone can shed some light on what they would change in the dimensions...

The top I'm putting on is Cedar and the plans call for 2.4mm so I'm guessing about 10% thicker for cedar may be close to the ball park....so i might start at 2.7mm - 3mm thick for the top and work down depending on stiffness.....

but the bracing I'm not so sure about .....
are the plans anywhere close to what the old martins we're?
And also as per using cedar on a face would you make the bracing 10% bigger on a cedar faced guitar to add strength for the cedar?

All I know at this stage is I'm going cedar face/scalloped bracing

thanks Grant


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:13 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:55 pm
Posts: 698
Location: Australia
Hi Grant

I'm using 6mm x 13mm for braces on OM tops.

They sound fine.

Cheers


_________________

------------------------------------------------------
Bob Connor
Geelong, Australia


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:29 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 3:50 pm
Posts: 4662
Location: Napa, CA
I have used 1/4" wide bracing all around. The X brace varies in height according to the stiffness of the top and is scalloped according to the voice you seek. Consider the tone bars and finger braces the same way.

I have not built with Cedar, so I can't offer any advice on thickness. Hesh's recommendation of .130" would seem to be a good start.

As others have stated, this plan is way over-braced.

_________________
JJ
Napa, CA
http://www.DonohueGuitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:36 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:16 am
Posts: 2244
Location: United States
First name: michael
Last Name: mcclain
City: pendleton
State: sc
Zip/Postal Code: 29670
Status: Professional
somehow i just don't think that your 5/32" sounds correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:47 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:44 pm
Posts: 110
Location: Canada
for my first build i began with the antes plan. thank goodness that a local professional was willing to help me out and checked over the plan before i started cutting any wood. the guy saved my bacon. had i built according to plan i'm sure i would have been disappointed and may not have had the resolve to build another.

what i do is pretty close to bob on dimensions. apart from the popsicle and transverse above the soundhole, all my other braces are 6mm wide. the 'x' is usually about 14 tall. this is also where the tonebar nearest the bridge begins. the second tonebar starts with about 11 or 12mm and gets shaped down from there. the fingers are about 6 - 7mm tall and get shaped down from that.

another thing that might be important - my approach to using the antes plan with the thinner braces was to take the difference in thickness off the tailblock side of each brace. i've done 5 OM's this way and it's worked great.

phil


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:57 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:09 pm
Posts: 163
Location: Australia
thanks guys ...sounds like a 1/4" is popular....
I will consult the plans and check the differences...

I don't want a dead top...Its hard to know what to do considering most plans assume your using spruce face....and I'm using cedar
I think I'll go with same size braces but make the face slightly thicker...I'm hoping this is the right direction to travel in.
again thanks for the info
Grant


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:34 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:38 pm
Posts: 1542
Location: United States
    Martin may have had standard sizes but the variance between them in the old days was a bit extreem to todays standards. The spec of the old days varied as much as 1/4"
    Now as for the OM and the antes drawing , well it is close but not anywhere near exact. I think this was done for legal issues maybe?
    As stated the bracing was 1/4" and the height is 9/16. The profile is also a bit different. The back braces on the original OM's were alot different that shown.
   the first 2 back braces were close , the lower 2 are 3/4 wide 3/8 high and radiused almost to the point of looking like a broom handle. The back radius is 15 foot and the top is actually angled 1 degree with a radius on the top braces at 28 foot.
    I hope this helps
john hall
blues creek guitars


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com