Official Luthiers Forum! http://w-ww.luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
Lutz vs Carpathian Spruce?? http://w-ww.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10102&t=10692 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | WalterK [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi Folks, I will be trying my first Lutz top very soon. I have been using Carpathian Sp. lately and have found it to be of excellent qualities. Beautiful creamy color, very stiff and a very exciting tap tone which will rival an Adi in most cases. Has anyone used both species and what can I expect from a Lutz top as opposed to a Carpathian top? ![]() Is it fare to make this comparison? Thanks, walter |
Author: | Howard Klepper [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
It's like King Kong vs Godzilla. Just my opinion. [edit] ![]() |
Author: | Colin S [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Walter like Howard said. Carpathian is just ordinary European spruce grown in the Carpathian mountains, exactly the same species, Picea abies, as Italian or German or Swiss spruce. I love most Euro, by far my favourite top wood, so it would be no different for a good sample of 'Carpathian'. I've not built with Lutz yet, though I have some in my stash, but from inspection of it I'd say that if I couldn't get Euro, I'd be perfectly happy to use lutz instead, it's the nearest thing to Euro I've seen from your side of the pond. But really it's down to the actual piece of wood, generalising is very dangerous when it comes to wood. Colin |
Author: | JJ Donohue [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
My last (SJ) used Carpathian and I love the sound. I'll be completing the same model soon with Lutz and looking forward to the comparison. |
Author: | Don Williams [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:01 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Colin, you really should give up the lower grade woods and use Sitka. It's the best there is. |
Author: | Colin S [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:43 am ] |
Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=Don Williams] Colin, you really should give up the lower grade woods and use Sitka. It's the best there is.[/QUOTE] Now Don, you know I love sitka. I find that grades above AA give out a really good heat, but you need some of the lower grade stuff to get the fire started. ![]() Colin |
Author: | Serge Poirier [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:57 am ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Don Williams [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I really don't get you Sitka-haters....it's fantastic wood. Believe it or not, the best sounding guitars I've made have been sitka. Maybe you need better building chops to get the most out of it... <ducking> ![]() ![]() |
Author: | WalterK [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:21 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The second guitar that I have made had a lot to be desired cosmetically. I used a lower grade sitka spruce simply because I didn't have a lot of $$$$$ to spend. I will never sell that old guitar because it sounds wonderful in every way. I have since gone back a couple of times and redone a few things to make it look a little better. It's just not for sale!! Spruce is a great top wood. walter ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Colin S [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:39 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Actually the first few guitar I built I used sitka, and it is without doubt very good topwood for those that build in a way that suits it and more importantly play in a style that suits it. It's just that for me Euro does it very much better. I just think that Sitka seems to need driving harder, and lacks the sublety that good Euro, and to some extent Adi, has. I might consider Englemann, and I definitely like the feel of Lutz. But while I have a good supply of Euro and I do get fabulous Euro, well... Colin |
Author: | Don Williams [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hey Colin, I now exactly what you mean. In reality, it's all about what we like the sound of, and what style music we like to play. I happen to really like the sound of sitka, and I also really like adi. Looking back through all the guitars I've played through the years, two of the four that stand out the most in sound quality had sitka tops. Both were Dreadnoughts too. ![]() Another was a cedar Lowden, and the other (another dread) had a top that I can't be sure of, but it was probably sitka. Might have been euro. Euro is only "nice" in my book, I don't see it as anymore special than other spruces per se. Personally, I'm not a fan of Engelmann. It just doesn't do it for me, but I have some very nice sets of it and may eventually use it again. I recently had a person talking to me about building a guitar for him. He didn't want "Sitka" because that's what was on most production guitars, so he deemed it somehow inferior. I knew right then in the conversation that I wasn't sure I could build him a guitar he would like. I and wasn't sure I wanted to, either. ![]() ![]() I think he will end up with a Taylor... |
Author: | James Orr [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:43 am ] |
Post subject: | |
This is going to fail as an analogy, but I'll take a crack at it anyway. I'm using Italian because a luthier I really admire suggested it for my style/sound goals. I went with it blindly, but after listening to a lot of clips on the dream guitars website, I believe it sounds like adi with a twist. On an electric, that twist would be a twist of the tone knob, just a notch or two, take a hair of the brightness off. Or the presence knob on an amp. |
Author: | Shane Neifer [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:12 am ] |
Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=Don Williams] I think he will end up with a Taylor... [/QUOTE] Ah! But if it was an R.Taylor, it might be Lutz!! ![]() Shane |
Author: | Colin S [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Don, one of the best guitars I've ever heard was a sitka topped Dreadnaught too! Not however played by me, when I tried it it was weak and lacking in dynamic subtlety. You see it's not the sitka that is no good it's the sitka/Colin combination that sucks! Nothing wrong with a good bit of sitka in the right hands both builder and player. Colin |
Author: | Dave White [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=Shane Neifer] [QUOTE=Don Williams] I think he will end up with a Taylor... [/QUOTE] Ah! But if it was an R.Taylor, it might be Lutz!! ![]() Shane[/QUOTE] Shane, Wow - first George Lowden and now Bob Taylor. Man that's fantastic ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Colin S [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Shane, I hope you have a stash marked 'OLF members only' tucked away? Colin |
Author: | Don Williams [ Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Having never experienced this Lutz spruce for myself, just exactly how would you folks describe it? It's a sitka hybrid, so wouldn't it be pretty much the same???? |
Author: | Dave White [ Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:49 am ] |
Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=Don Williams] Having never experienced this Lutz spruce for myself, just exactly how would you folks describe it? It's a sitka hybrid, so wouldn't it be pretty much the same???? [/QUOTE] Don, That's what I thought at first - but Lutz looks and feels very much like Euro spruce (very light and strong/stiff - the white spruce lineage is clear) but has the good qualities of sitka too - really tight grain and silking and it doesn't dent and ding when you look at it the wrong way like Euro. Heres' a pic of Euro/Lutz/sitka (left to right) I sent to Shane when I first got some of his wood: ![]() Tone wise it has almost all of the complexities you get with Euro (I'd say it's about 95% similar to Euro) and in that way it is similarish to Adi. But then I haven't built with adi and have only played about 3 addi topped guitars. Plus for the quality of the top wood it is remarkable value for money and it comes with Shane's fantastic attention to detail and sevice. |
Author: | Colin S [ Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Don, I'd say it 's closer to good Euro or Adi than sitka. You really must get some, it could be your own new love. As I said if I couldn't get good Euro (and we can over here) then I would be happy as long as Lutz was available. Colin |
Author: | Don Williams [ Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:01 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Wow....that is quite an endorsement. I'll have to buy a few hundred sets to sell to my friends over the Big Pond... I'll say this Colin my friend, if you love mahogany as much as you do, then your taste can't be bad. ![]() |
Author: | Dave White [ Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Filippo, I'm sure Shane will comment, but kermodie and Lutz are the same wood. |
Author: | Colin S [ Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:25 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Filippo, Carpathian IS just normal European Spruce (Picea abies) grown in the Carpathian mountains. Colin |
Author: | Shane Neifer [ Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Fillipo, Kermode is Lutz, as Dave said. Mario lives only 30 or 40 miles away from me and our harvest areas overlap. Lutz is no different than any other spruce though in the regard that a good tree will result in good tops just as poor tree will only produce poor wood. Next is the attention paid to the processing of the wood. An unattentive processor can turn good wood into bad tops by introducing runout and cutting off quarter. The whole process is not rocket science but it does require paying attention to the details, once you understand what they are. Anyway, Mario has access to good wood and has been doing this long enough that I would hope he has the processing figured out. I haven't seen any of his wood for a while now though. But he is certainly another (and probably only) Lutz option. Shane |
Author: | peterm [ Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=Don Williams] Colin, you really should give up the lower grade woods and use Sitka. It's the best there is.[/QUOTE] Sitka is great stuff... I've been using if for bridges and necks and it works great! ![]() |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |