Official Luthiers Forum!
http://w-ww.luthiersforum.com/forum/

A Couple of Photos of Trev
http://w-ww.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10102&t=12150		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  bob_connor [ Tue May 22, 2007 11:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
Well Trev and Cheryl, the OM twins, are finished so I thought I'd post a couple of photos of Trev the parabolic. I can't find Cheryl. She disappeared into Dave's house and I can't prise it off him. They both sound pretty sweet.

For anyone who missed the thread on these a few months back they are identical apart from the bracing. Trev is parabolic while Cheryl is scalloped.

This was an experiment to see how the different bracing styles affect the tone of the instrument.

Did they differ?

You'll have to wait until next week when I post sound clips and you can decide yourself.

Cheers













Author:  Chris Cordle [ Wed May 23, 2007 12:01 am ]
Post subject: 
Whoooo!    Very nice my friend.

What is the laminate wood combo on the neck?
Author:  Kim [ Wed May 23, 2007 12:02 am ]
Post subject: 
[QUOTE=bob_connor] This was an experiment to see how the different bracing styles affect the tone of the instrument.

Did they differ?

You'll have to wait until next week when I post sound clips and you can decide yourself.

Cheers

[/QUOTE]

Your such a tease Bob. Trev look's great but would love to see the pair in day light, the ab looks so cool and sound port too

Have you got a post coming up showing your "Ubeaut" hard shellac process

Cheers

Kim
Author:  bob_connor [ Wed May 23, 2007 12:12 am ]
Post subject: 
Thanks Chris.

The neck is

mahog/black fibre/maple/BF/Oz Blackwood/BF/Maple/BF/mahog

Cheers
Author:  Bill Greene [ Wed May 23, 2007 12:13 am ]
Post subject: 
Wow, that's impressive to say the least. What beautiful detail work.   
Author:  bob_connor [ Wed May 23, 2007 12:23 am ]
Post subject: 
Thanks Kim.

I'll try and get some better pics and post both of them along with sound. better still I'll get Dave's father in law to take them 'cause I'm not a photographers gluteus maximus.

It's been raining and gloomy here in Victoria for the best part of a week so were all a bit stunned . So no good for outside pics.

I've got a mate who is the manager of the local Martin dealership lined up to play on the recording and make some comments so it's a matter of 'getting the planets to align'. Hopefully I'll have it all together early next week.

PS Hope the missus hasn't discovered your feeding frenzy.

Cheers
Author:  bob_connor [ Wed May 23, 2007 12:25 am ]
Post subject: 
Hesh - I know there's fondling going on down there.
Author:  bob_connor [ Wed May 23, 2007 12:38 am ]
Post subject: 
[QUOTE=Hesh1956] Hey Bob Trev does not look at all like a stinking bogan - what gives?

[/QUOTE]

I know, I know.

I was torn between the check flanellete purfling, bushy beard rosette and a mullett peghead inlay

Cheers
Author:  Kim [ Wed May 23, 2007 12:57 am ]
Post subject: 
[QUOTE=bob_connor]
I was torn between the check flanellete purfling, bushy beard rosette and a mullett peghead inlay

Cheers[/QUOTE]

Strooff Bob, that woulda bin beuoowdiful mate, dead set, yoos blokes have got more class than a rat with a gold tooth, unrool. Yoos can put me down for wun just like it no wuckers mate. Could ya build me in a ciggy holda for me winy blues on the peghead and a tinny holda where ya got the sound port thingy? Oah yeah and a Barnzey inlay made up of VB cans would look grouse too mate ta

(I won't bother running the spell check )

Cheers

Kim
Author:  WaddyThomson [ Wed May 23, 2007 1:17 am ]
Post subject: 
That's some fine looking guitar.  It looks so good, it's hard to believe there is a mate that looks as good.  Can't wait to see more pictures and hear the comparison.   
Author:  Dave Anderson [ Wed May 23, 2007 1:24 am ]
Post subject: 
Bob, Trev is a very nice guitar,I really like it a lot!

The sound clip will be interesting between the two.
Author:  Andy Zimmerman [ Wed May 23, 2007 2:34 am ]
Post subject: 
Beautiful Beautiful
Can't wait for the sound clips and the comparison
Author:  charliewood [ Wed May 23, 2007 3:14 am ]
Post subject: 
Thats amazing!
There is just something about an ornate instrument, {but not too highly ornate}
that also sounds fantastic,
they just tickle me pink!
I am very keen to hear the difference betwen the 2 guitars... Im sure they both sound great though.
Cheers
Charliewood
Author:  Michael Lloyd [ Wed May 23, 2007 10:06 am ]
Post subject: 
Gorgeous! Can't wait to here the sound clips.

Author:  KiwiCraig [ Wed May 23, 2007 9:21 pm ]
Post subject: 

Great work Bob. I look forward to the sound clips.


Cheers Craig
Author:  CarltonM [ Thu May 24, 2007 7:11 am ]
Post subject: 
You guys are doing some really nice work. Well done!
Author:  Dave White [ Thu May 24, 2007 7:15 am ]
Post subject: 
Bob,

Cool - that looks really sweet.

Looking forward to the sound clips.
Author:  bob_connor [ Thu May 24, 2007 8:54 am ]
Post subject: 
Thanks gentlemen.

Charliewood - I think these are on the border of what I personally like in ornateness. I actually prefer something a little more subdued but we did them both with the intention of a)testing out the paua purfling technique and b) having a couple of guitars with ab purfling to show customers.

Dave - remember the discussion we had about the DADGAD guitar a few months back.

Well, the bloke who wants the DADGAD played both of these last weekend to make a decision which style of bracing we were going to put on his new guitar.

It took about two hours of indecision before he decided he liked the scalloped braces better.

He liked the more pronounced bottom end.

I personally think that the parabolic sound would suit him better in a session, (we tend to get Bodhran orchestras at sessions here in Oz) but he is the paying customer so it's ultmately his call.

What's the difference between a bodhran player and a dead rabbit on the side of the road?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The rabbit might have been on the way to a gig.


Cheers
Author:  Dave White [ Thu May 24, 2007 6:59 pm ]
Post subject: 
[QUOTE=bob_connor] Thanks gentlemen.
Dave - remember the discussion we had about the DADGAD guitar a few months back.

Well, the bloke who wants the DADGAD played both of these last weekend to make a decision which style of bracing we were going to put on his new guitar.

It took about two hours of indecision before he decided he liked the scalloped braces better.

He liked the more pronounced bottom end.

I personally think that the parabolic sound would suit him better in a session, (we tend to get Bodhran orchestras at sessions here in Oz) but he is the paying customer so it's ultmately his call.

What's the difference between a bodhran player and a dead rabbit on the side of the road?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The rabbit might have been on the way to a gig.


Cheers[/QUOTE]

Bob,

Well - they do like their bottoms

My favourite bhodran joke:

A man goes into a Dublin pub and puts a plastic bag on the table. The barman says "What's in the bag?". The man replies "2lb of semtex". The barman says "Thank goodness, for a moment there I thought is was a bhodran".
Author:  Kim [ Thu May 24, 2007 7:16 pm ]
Post subject: 



Author:  bob_connor [ Fri May 25, 2007 12:24 am ]
Post subject: 
What's the difference between a bodhran solo and premature ejaculation?

Nothing!

You know it's coming but there's nothing you can do about it.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/