Official Luthiers Forum! http://w-ww.luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
Latest on the bench http://w-ww.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10102&t=2915 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | chipspencer [ Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:26 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hello everyone! It's been a while since I've been around here. I too had to unplug and focus on life outside the 'puter. I've finally gotten around to finishing up the Cedar/Bubinga 7 string archtop I've talked about in the past. Somewhere there is a post here with pix of the rim..... Anyway, here are a couple of shots of the body after the finish. I'll post pix later this week of the finished product. BTW, that is the cedar top plate. I'll post pix of the back plate in a while. ![]() From the lower bout ![]() From the upper bout(sort of) Chip |
Author: | RussellR [ Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:39 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Chip I like that very elegant look, lovely finish |
Author: | LanceK [ Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Chip, I remember that rim, the guitar looks fantastic! What made you select cedar for the top? I'm not very well versed in the arch top world, but Ive only ever hear of spruce tops. |
Author: | chipspencer [ Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:28 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Lance, Spruce is the de facto standard for archtops. I am always striving to be different. The Cedar was originally meant for a nylon string archtop experiment a la Benedetto or Moll or Carruth, etc. However, after hearing a 7 string (low B) played I had to have one. Thus the Bubinga/Cedar mix. I am excited to get it strung up. I'm hoping it will have the same warmth a cedar top classical or flat top has. Chip |
Author: | chipspencer [ Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Ok kiddies, Here are two shots of the back plate. The skunk stripe is Curly Maple. The Bubinga was extremely tough to carve. The back plate took about 3 weeks to carve. Chip ![]() From lower bout ![]() From upper bout (sort of) |
Author: | Dennis Leahy [ Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Chip, I can see 2 side ports, but don't see any f-holes or soundhole. I have seen flattops without soundholes, but can't remember seeing an archtop without them. Have you built this way before? Dennis |
Author: | chipspencer [ Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Nope. This is an experiment. I read about Bill Moll making an archtop without sound holes. I don;t know how his guitar turned out, but it sounded cool. I'll try it with just sound ports first. If it doesn't sound good, I'll break out the rotozip :) If anyone has had any success/failures with this, I'd be interested to hear about it. Chip |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |