Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Apr 24, 2025 4:01 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:11 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 2103
Location: United Kingdom
Hi me again !

On a post Kevin Gallagher made in reply to AndyZ having too much angle on the front of his guitar. Kevin said to lower the tail end of the body a little.

Just to make sure I have this clear in my head presummably Kevin was talking about effectively tipping the top back on it's centre axis ?

Have I got this right ?

Many Thanks

Russell.RussellR38616.5675115741


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:31 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 1906
Location: United States
No. You only want a 1.5-2 degree angle on the upper bout where the neck is going to meet the body. That is accomplished several ways but not by moving the top around relative to the sides. Careful planing and some minor sanding are usually the method.

p.s. I am assuming this is a flat top guitar with no dome sanded into the sides. I haven't read Kevin's response but I think he meant that you could reduce the angle of the upper bout by removing, and thereby shortening the sides overall. In the exteme... by doing that, you could remove enough material that the tail end would be equal in height to the heal end and therefore be level. But the overall depth or height of the guitars' sides would be smaller/less.Dave-SKG38616.5686805556

_________________
Dave Bland

remember...

"If it doesn't play in tune...it's just pretty wood"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:01 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 2103
Location: United Kingdom
Thanks Dave

This was the original post

If you were to take more off of the tail end of your rim when your putting the radius on the rim set in preparation for the top installation, you will find that you'll eliminate this problem on your next guitar. I have a powered radius dish machine that spins my dish at relatively low RPM while I can adjust the four support points on the mold in order to allow any quadrant of the rim to be favored during the sanding process and adjust the tilt of the final location of the peak of the parabola that results from the bracing radius and side radius coming together to form the arch.RussellR38616.5849768519


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 9:32 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 2103
Location: United Kingdom
By the way I am not arguing with this I am sure Kevin knows a lot more about it than I do, I just want to understand the effect this has asI can't quite figure it out.



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 2:52 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:16 am
Posts: 2244
Location: United States
First name: michael
Last Name: mcclain
City: pendleton
State: sc
Zip/Postal Code: 29670
Status: Professional
draw yourself a picture; remember one is worth a thousand words.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:43 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 2103
Location: United Kingdom
Thanks Michael

I think I have it, What Kevin is doing is effectively incresing the angle from the Tail Block to the center point, and thus decreasing the angle from the Neck Block to the center point.

I think I have this right ?

The reason I am asking about this is, I am trying to come up with a way to ensure I have a consistent !.5 Degree angle on each guitar I make, then when I put the body onto the neck jig I have I can setup to cut my angle and always know I am going to have a good fit all round.

Would it be right to say with the neck block set dead upright, an angle of 91.5 % should be present between the front face and the top surface ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com