Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Apr 26, 2025 9:41 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:18 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:24 am
Posts: 225
Location: United States
The first classical I built had a 3 3/4" heel block. I would like this next one to be a slightly larger guitar (length will be 19 5/8 and the lower bout width will be 14 1/2).

I am looking for a bigger and louder sound. If I go to a 4" heel block will this help, or is this just too high? This will obviously increase the width of the guitar.

Thanks,

Doug

_________________
Guitars...One's too many...Twenty is not enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:40 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:23 am
Posts: 2353
Location: United States
Doug,
Here are a couple of thoughts...
On my classical guitars I have a depth of 95mm at the end block and 88mm at the heel block. These measurments are without the top and back thickness which would add approx another 5mm to the overall depth of the instrument. You would be adding another 12 mm. roughly to each of these measurements plus then the back and top thicknesses. In my opinion this is a bit much. I can't recall ever seeing one that deep but most of what we do is educated guesses anyway. Who knows , maybe you will start making deeper instruments and in a few years everyone will be copying you.       


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:19 pm
Posts: 1051
Location: United States
Bigger and louder sound does not necessarily mean a bigger body. Panormo was known for his loud instruments and they were smaller than Torres.

In the 70's and 80's builders such as Ramirez and Fleta tried for a bigger sound with a bogger body and longer scale length (from a norm of 650mm to as long as 665mm) but with that longer scale length it made it harder for players that did not have large hands to play some of the reaches needed that were more easily done with a 650 or shorter scale length.

Even with a larger body they did not increase the body depth more than about 5mm as with a deeper body the boominess of the bass has a negative effect for a classical player. In a great classical the lack of bass is not the issue it is a matter of getting the first string to sing up its entire length.

Other builders like Contreras with his double tops and the Smallman and Damman with their lattice braced tops have been focusing more volume without necessarily a bigger body by controlling things like the weight of all of the components.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:26 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 2:40 am
Posts: 993
Location: United States
Doug,

As a long time classical player (25+ yrs), I've never played a guitar a big as the one you propose, however I have played some very loud ones. I think you may actually run the risk of making the guitar quieter with your mods. Without increasing the scale length, the additional mass may dampen the guitar. Usually you want to build as light as possible without sacrificing stability to get maximum volume. Like Shawn said, a bigger scale does not mean more volume. Let us all know how it works out. Thinking outside the box is how new innovations arrise.

Cheers!

John


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com