Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 7:23 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: boxtar classical
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:02 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:43 am
Posts: 1326
Location: chicagoland, illinois
City: chicagoland
State: illinois
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
as some of you may know, i have been working on a "classical" style neck. i don't have any of the acoustic guitar equipment, like side bender, heating blanket/pipe bender, side molds, solera, thousands of clamps, top and side material...
so i was thinking, before i commit totally and plunge in to a thousand bucks of more crap, as long as this first neck is pretty crude, how feasible is a box shaped construction? i don't care if it "looks dumb". :D
i have read about sides somewhere and how the thickness of them does not influence sound, so i am thinking if i can build the sides out of standard lumber plank, perhaps maple if i'm feeling fancy, i can eliminate all the things that are (literally) keeping me awake at night. then all i'd have to do is purchase a top and back, no other equipment, and i could have me a "boxtar" classical.
but my question is, has it been done before, full size(not cigar box), and if so, is it possible to get a decent sound from a square box?
at this point i don't see why not; the only thing i can think of is: silly appearance; playing ergonomics; and maybe weight
cheers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: boxtar classical
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:55 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 10:32 am
Posts: 2616
First name: alan
Last Name: stassforth
City: Santa Rosa
State: ca
Zip/Postal Code: 95404
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
You really don't need to spend thousands on tools to make an acoustic.
Especially if you already have some.
You can make a lot of the tools yourself.
Get the book on Classic guitar making by Sloane.
He can show you how to do it on the cheap.
A boxtar would probably look silly.
Bo Diddley might like it though!
Then again, if that's what ya wanna do,
just do it!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: boxtar classical
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:34 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:43 am
Posts: 1326
Location: chicagoland, illinois
City: chicagoland
State: illinois
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
...so lets just say i wanted to go thru with this: how about the side thicknesses? can they be ridiculously thick, like 5/8"? i read that side thickness does not matter, as far as sound goes....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: boxtar classical
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:44 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:01 am
Posts: 542
Location: United States
I remember hearing one time that side thickness does affect sound. Thinner sides are louder but have more overtones. Loud flamenco guitars are known for thin sides. I think...? At any rate, I wouldn't go 5/8". You could always find something 1/8 or 1/4 I would think. Thats would still be pretty thick for sides.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com