Official Luthiers Forum! http://w-ww.luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
1st build http://w-ww.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10123&t=43713 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | mechanix [ Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:55 am ] |
Post subject: | 1st build |
Hello everyone, firstly let me introduce myself since this is my first post. My name is Brian, I'm from Scotland and I am a complete noob about to start the guitar building adventure. I have always had a passion for the guitar as an object and as an instrument and have been lucky enough to play lots of very rare and expensive guitars all my life due to my father being a collector of high end vintage stuff. I was dragged around countless guitar shows all over the world as a youngster and I guess the bug hit me young lol. I work as a mechanic/engineer and fabricate all kind of things from metal and sometimes carbon fibre. The engineering side of things is all cool but I'm sure along the way I'll need to ask you guys many dumb and incredibly stupid questions so i apologise in advance for those My first project is going to be a hardtail ash tele with 25" scale, flame maple neck, Macassar ebony fb and headstock veneer. The wood blanks are all ordered and I am now looking at hardware and inlay materials etc but for my first attempt i intend to keep it quite simple. My first stupid question is about truss rods. What benefit is there in fitting a 2 way rod? My understanding was that a truss rod held the neck back against the tension of the strings, so why would it be necessary to put pressure in the opposite direction? |
Author: | Sandywood [ Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Brian, sometimes back bow can happen and the string tension may not be enough to pull the neck back. The double action rod is security. |
Author: | mechanix [ Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Got ya, thank you Sandy. |
Author: | dzsmith [ Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Brian, I would not use that piece for a fretboard. |
Author: | Sandywood [ Fri Jun 27, 2014 12:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
I agree with Dan. |
Author: | mechanix [ Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Thanks guys, I've emailed my supplier asking for a new one. Its a dang shame too because its a beautiful piece of wood, i really liked the bold stripes. I will ask if i can purchase that at a reduced price also and may use it for something smaller in the future. The bottom of it is fine lol. I'll let you know how i get on. |
Author: | dzsmith [ Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Man, that is one swell looking piece of Maple! Gonna be awesome finished. |
Author: | dzsmith [ Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Your design looks really cool! I like it! |
Author: | cphanna [ Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Hi, Brian. I'm just chiming in to say that I like your "slant" on things, too. |
Author: | dzsmith [ Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
If the mockup has a good feel, I'd leave it as-is. That's a great idea making a mockup. I stick the neck blank onto the body blank to get a feel for balance. you may want to do this to decide if the body should be larger or thicker to balance the neck weight. I think the small body looks very cool. Dan |
Author: | Sandywood [ Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
I like the mockup. I like the head too...I didn't care much for the original design - it seemed to be a left hand neck on a right hand guitar. I know it's just preference but made a big difference to me. |
Author: | mechanix [ Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Yeah me too michael. It defo looks better the right way around but im still not sure on the design. I will be starting the neck at the weekend so I still have time to tinker with the headstock a little, but I can see this being the first of many guitars from my workshop so I can develop the hs shape and stuff as I go. Still need to think of a name also. Tbh thats been the hardest thing to come up with so far. There is already a wilson guitars so I need to come up with something else and im stumped lol. |
Author: | Sandywood [ Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
Brian how it looks is what you prefer IMO. I do think it is important to consider how the strings pass through the slots in the nut. Maybe presenting accurate to scale ideas would prevent others from possibly misunderstanding your plans...? |
Author: | klooker [ Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
To me, the one on the right. The one on the left looks too squat, unless it balances the overall design somehow. Kevin Looker edit - I also agree that you need to give some serious consideration to the string paths. |
Author: | dzsmith [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 7:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
If you are doing a pick guard inlay, I'd definately do the inlay before rounding the edges to maximize the amount of wood on the outside edge of the inlay routing. I would have done the inlay prior to cutting the body to size, but I'm timid when it comes to routing. The build is looking very good. I like the body wood grain. Dan |
Author: | Sandywood [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 1st build |
I like to have the body sanded down very good before I do the roundover - inlayed guard or not. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |