Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 11:27 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: motojerbear's build
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:46 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 1170
First name: Rodger
Last Name: Knox
City: Baltimore
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21234
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
When you do revisit your original design, the bracing needs quite a bit of work.
The X is way too far south, and there are other problems as well.

_________________
A man hears what he wants to hear, and disreguards the rest. Paul Simon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: motojerbear's build
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:08 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:42 pm
Posts: 15
First name: Jeremy
Last Name: Chambers
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks for the affirmation guys. Here is a shot of the new design direction body style: Image

Rodger Knox wrote:
When you do revisit your original design, the bracing needs quite a bit of work.
The X is way too far south, and there are other problems as well.

I'm sure I'll need a bit of direction on this one too Roger. Is this "X" correct? I sent it a bit north but it still
seems a little squat. The lower bout is Lower bout is 15", waist is 9", and upper bout is 11.25". The total
length is 18.25 with 7" of top below the scale length bridge end.

As soon as I settle on the shape I like I'll pick the 1/2 which I think is smother more flowing and
mirror/ light table the other side.

Here's the top and sides:
Image

I think they look great together. The back is severely cupping at the moment. I'm not sure if it's
the low humidity as I don't have a system to control that yet. My plan was to build a box that would
store the wood at proper temp and humidity while not being worked, and not really get into
assembly till spring when it's nice and normal outside. I have put the back into a box with a
few cups of water and covered it:
Image

Here you can see the cupping. I hope this slows it down. The small separation is in the waist area.
I left them in the garage one night with the cellophane on, one night stickered next to a pan of water,
and this is the result. it was upper 30's no frost outside, probably 50's in the garage. hmmmmmmm :|
How much cupping is considered not usable? One side of the back is cupped perfect for my
radius and the other is opposite laughing6-hehe Oh well, thanks for all the help guys.

jeremy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: motojerbear's build
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:39 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:04 am
Posts: 773
First name: Peter
Last Name: Fenske
City: Leeds
State: Yorkshire
Country: Uk
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think cupping is really an issue. Once they are glued to the sides, they will stay in place. If you do want to get them flat beforehand, it's not so much the humidity level, but uneven humidity on each side of the board. If you put the boards on a flat surface (with the sides touching, not the centre) and weight it, the top will dry out quicker than the bottom and they should level out or start cupping the other way. Just keep turning them until they have acclimatized to your shop.

_________________
"I am always doing that which I cannot do, in order that I may learn how to do it."
Pablo Picasso

https://www.facebook.com/FenskeGuitars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: motojerbear's build
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:21 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:23 am
Posts: 262
First name: nick
Last Name: dingle
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Just sticker them once you have them joined, and put a bit of weight on them. They'll dry out evenly then, and you'll be right. I haven't worried too much about cupping, as the idea is to force otherwise flat bits of timber into the shapes WE want them to assume. I do make sure they're dry, tho....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: motojerbear's build
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:51 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:42 pm
Posts: 15
First name: Jeremy
Last Name: Chambers
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
nickinbruns wrote:
Just sticker them once you have them joined, and put a bit of weight on them. They'll dry out evenly then, and you'll be right. I haven't worried too much about cupping, as the idea is to force otherwise flat bits of timber into the shapes WE want them to assume. I do make sure they're dry, tho....
PeterF wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think cupping is really an issue. Once they are glued to the sides, they will stay in place. If you do want to get them flat beforehand, it's not so much the humidity level, but uneven humidity on each side of the board. If you put the boards on a flat surface (with the sides touching, not the centre) and weight it, the top will dry out quicker than the bottom and they should level out or start cupping the other way. Just keep turning them until they have acclimatized to your shop.


Thanks for the help guys. I'll see if they acclimate in the next few days.
I've been working on a neck design. I got a nice piece of wenge I'd like
to use. I know it's a bit heavier than the standard mog, but it's also a bit
stiffer. I was going to do a wenge/ sitka/ wenge lam job, but I think I'm
throwing that idea out.
ZekeM wrote:
Only thing you may want to reconsider is Sitka for a neck wood. If you are just wanting a light colored strip it may be ok, but necks have a tendency to want to bend and warp as is so you may want to consider another, stronger wood for this, perhaps maple.


Zeke, I'm not to worried about the strength of sitka as a neck wood. Here's a
shot of my electric with a maple/sitka/maple lam. The black strips are c/f: Image

It's a good thing that I used a double action truss rod with this! I filed the frets as level as
I could expecting the strings to pull in some relief. No such luck. I've got that truss rod
cranked hard backwards to get any relief at all, and I'm worried it's going to blow out the back of
the neck, so maybe the soft sitka was a bad idea after all. :lol: But it's definitely stable
and strong enough in this configuration.
The other problem with the sitka was staining from the satine (red tone block) and c/f stingers
during shaping and sanding. It turned into a game of one step forward two steps back. I'd like
to avoid that on this build as well.
I'm currently considering a multi wenge lam, with the second and forth pieces of the five will
be chambered to save weight. I know I wanted to get away from inovation on this build, but I'm
afraid of a neck heavy instrument. Anyone have experience with the "D" rod?
Should I just buckle and purchase mog?

jeremy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: motojerbear's build
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:55 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 1170
First name: Rodger
Last Name: Knox
City: Baltimore
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21234
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm certainly no expert on bracing, since I've only done 6 or 8 acoustics, but that looks like it's in the ballpark.

_________________
A man hears what he wants to hear, and disreguards the rest. Paul Simon


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com