Michael Jin wrote:
If you want to build a demo guitar, that's fine, but I would say that it could possibly lead to a lot of criticism and complaints down the line because you can never reproduce the demo exactly. Take the guitar for what it is and sell the one that customer is playing and likes. That way the customer knows exactly what he's getting and there's no room for complaints.
I think that the average buyer of handmade instruments is aware of the subtle nuances that are essentially unavoidable between two otherwise identical guitars. The demo/spec guitar acts as the builder's C.V. rather than a 'master' that future orders will be a carbon copy of. Such a guitar can be a very useful tool for the most discerning potential client when coupled with conversations with the builder and knowledge of their building history and reputation.
Why not just think of it as building yourself a guitar? Build it to YOUR specs... be your own client for a change. Play to your strengths and build a guitar you're proud to play and proud to share. Maybe a year or two down the track you'll get the opportunity to build yourself another demo guitar and expand your range with a different shape, woods etc.
I always try to have one guitar on the go that has no buyer. They tend to take 2-3 times as long to build but I enjoy having some variety and being able to jump from task to task so I don't get too burnt out by one guitar. To me they have three very appealing/useful purposes:
1. another guitar that I can play myself for a bit of variety,
2. something to show potential buyers when they come to the shop, and
3. a great way to make a sale when a customer is reluctant to enter a waiting list (often customers entering the handmade market for the first time).