Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Tue May 13, 2025 12:03 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 10:56 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:14 am
Posts: 2590
Location: United States
I saw a post a while back about a neck angle that was too great (backset)...I think someone recommended sanding the (already completed) guitar body from the bottom half of the soundhole down to the tail end to lessen the angle of the upper bout...Don? I dunno who for sure, but if this rings any bells could I get a re-post?

Thanks!

_________________
http://www.presnallguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:16 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 2227
Location: Canada
You could also try taking off the frets and planing down the finger board... Don't ask me how I know this

_________________
I'd like to be able to prove, just for once, that money wouldn't make me happy...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 12:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:14 am
Posts: 2590
Location: United States
Alain, that's a good idea! And I surely won't ask, but I assume someone told you about this!! Luckily for me, this is a guitar body "in the white"...so thinning the f/b would work...I could see how the lower body sanding would possibly work, but at the same time, I see the uneven thinning of the top showing at the soundhole and the rosette being sanded thru, and the binding showing the uneven thickness...(of course, I could always rout away the binding and do it over)...

_________________
http://www.presnallguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:03 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 2227
Location: Canada
Yep Larry, someone told me allright! It was none other than Tony Karoll who helped me get my action back after I had foolishly glued on the neck BEFORE making sure the angle/bridge clearance was all right...

I would have done as Hesh says had the neck not been glued on...

_________________
I'd like to be able to prove, just for once, that money wouldn't make me happy...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 10:17 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:14 am
Posts: 2590
Location: United States
[QUOTE=Hesh1956] I remove material on the neck heel just under the fretboard and then re-floss the cheeks which reduces the neck angle.[/QUOTE]

That's what I do too Hesh, but this looks as though the rim sanding was too zealous before the top was glued on...in fact, if I put a straight edge on the upper bout in the f/b extension area, it runs out at about .50" at the bridge location WITHOUT a f/b on! That's gonna make for a really tall bridge!! I think the guy's best bet would be to do it over...but I know you guys out there are geniouses! So, thought I'd ask...

Larry

_________________
http://www.presnallguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com