JJ Donohue wrote:
To our European brethern...can you describe the appearance and tonal differences, if any, among European Spruce called Carpathian, German and Italian. If none, and they are all officially known as P. albies then would it be reasonable to call it all Euro Spruce?
We harvest Red Spruce from areas much farther and wider in North America than the 3 Euro Spruce regions
JJ, as you probably know, picea abies has a much larger growing range than Carpathia + the Alps. It is by far THE most common wood up here too, and is used for construction and pulp mostly. Here, it is a relative newcomer; as little as 800 years ago it was only found in a few areas. Due to the numerous mountains and valleys commercial harvesting is not practical in in some remote parts of this country, and there are stands there with large specimens as old as 450 years. Instrument makers in this country have traditionally gotten their spruce from some of these places; many of the Hardanger fiddle makers for example like to use spruce from the Norefjell mountain. Of course nobody is cutting it and selling for tonewood here, and so far I've only made one mandolin with it; nice, clear, quartered pieces large enough for 2 piece guitar tops have unfortunately proved very hard to come by.
So it is the same species, but is it the
same? I think my Italian spruce is generally a bit different than the local spruce, I even think it smells a bit different when I work it. I don't think local growing conditions can account for
all all differences, but I am pretty sure good tonewood can be found in lots of areas where you don't normally hear about on these forums. If this was a Hardanger fiddle or perhaps 'langeleik' forum, you'd all be pestering me to get you some of
my spruce!