Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 7:50 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Am I missing something?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:59 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:35 pm
Posts: 2
I am new to "luthierism" or lets build our egos a bit, "luthierology". Yes that sounds much better.

I am planning a dreadnought build and as my grandfather always taught me, "measure twice, cut once".

I have been investigating building a radius dish for the radius on the back and top typical in dreadnought guitars made popular by such manufactures such as Martin, Gibson, Taylor etc.
As I do with anything, after doing some research on the net, I decided to put some pencil to paper and just see what kind of radius we were talking about. It seems that common top radii are 25', 28', or 30'. Furthermore most of these radius discs that you can purchase on the net are usually about 24'' in diameter, or 2'. So I sorted through my brain to remember my old trig formulas. I wanted to see just how much radius that is. It seems at first thought that a 2' length arc on the circumference of a 25' (for example) radius circle sure wouldn't be much. So I calculated.

Long story short (if you want to know the math, I will be happy to mail or post it) the difference the arc length of a 2' chord on a 25' circle is .0005'. Or in other words, there is less than 1/2 a thousandth of an inch in "arcing".

However, with that said, seeing pictures on the net of these radius dishes there appears to be definite visible arcing. So therefore, I plead, "am I missing something?"

Thanks, Larks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:03 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:19 am
Posts: 493
Location: United States
Actually it's about .240".

I draw it in CAD and measure the distance. My trig is getting pretty rusty these days.

That's for a 25' radius.

_________________
Horton, MI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:04 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 8:29 am
Posts: 960
Location: Northern Ireland
First name: Martin
Last Name: Edwards
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I couldn't do the maths (not the s!!) either.......

you've gone wrong somewhere, there's more dip than that. at a rough guess from memory id say about 1/4"

I don't use dishes, I sand the braces to shape then glue them it with BIG clamps to pull the top round to meet them

_________________
My soundclick xx luthier blog xx luthier soundclick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 5:02 am
Posts: 8551
Location: United States
First name: Lance
Last Name: Kragenbrink
City: Vandercook Lake
State: Michigan
Zip/Postal Code: 49203
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Its also more than just an arc, its a dome. Think of it as taking a guitar shaped piece off a 25' beach ball.

_________________
Support the OLF! Bookmark our STEWMAC link Today!
Lance@LuthiersForum.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:12 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:35 pm
Posts: 2
Actually, I think we are talking about different measurements. However, thanks to your reply I reevaluated my logic.
I was comparing the difference between the length of the arc (arc length) and the length of the 2' (chord) which is precisely 2.005' vs 2'. However that is probably not what I was looking for. I actually need what is called the segment height which would amount to the maximum depth of the dish created. This measurement actually comes out to 0.020008'.
Still a small number, however, now I can see that it is much more in the ballpark of significant.

Thanks for your reply, now I understand.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:14 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 am
Posts: 1271
Math is why I made these the old fasioned way, screwing together a 30' trammel and carefully swinging arcs.

The arc is on both sides of the forms and shows the approx difference between. There's a bridge pin on the table for some perspective.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
http://www.chassonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:21 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:03 am
Posts: 6680
Location: Abbotsford, BC Canada
Yup somethings wrong with your math.

Image

R=h+d therefore

h=R-d

d=Image

so, h=R-Image

here we go

R=300" (25' radius)

h=300"-1/2*sqrt of {(4*300^2)-24^2}

h=300"-1/2*sqrt of {359,424}

h=300"-1/2*599.5198078

h=300"-299.7599039

h=0.240096"

_________________
My Facebook Guitar Page

"There's really no wrong way, as long as the results are what's desired." Charles Fox

"We have to constantly remind ourselves what we're doing....No Luthier is putting a man on the moon!" Harry Fleishman

"Generosity is always different in the eye of the person who didn't receive anything, but who wanted some." Waddy Thomson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:23 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:03 am
Posts: 6680
Location: Abbotsford, BC Canada
Just read your post, seems you were calculating a different thing.

Anyway, hope my simple pictures help.

_________________
My Facebook Guitar Page

"There's really no wrong way, as long as the results are what's desired." Charles Fox

"We have to constantly remind ourselves what we're doing....No Luthier is putting a man on the moon!" Harry Fleishman

"Generosity is always different in the eye of the person who didn't receive anything, but who wanted some." Waddy Thomson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:33 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:40 am
Posts: 1900
Location: Spokane, Washington
First name: Pat
Last Name: Foster
State: Eastern WA
Focus: Build
There's the long compass way of drawing it, this link from Jon Sevy's site.

http://gicl.cs.drexel.edu/people/sevy/luthierie/luthierie.html

Useful after figuring the rise (or drop in this case) using his arc calculator.

_________________
now known around here as Pat Foster
_________________
http://www.patfosterguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:54 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:48 am
Posts: 2094
Some luthier genius on this forum posted a technique involving the placement of a shim a determined distance from the mouth of a plane throat, marking the center of the brace to be planed, then planing that brace either side until a radius is formed.

I used this technique on #3, and I am very pleased with the results, using cam clamps to glue on the braces.

Kudos to whoever posted that technique!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Colin Heaton and 79 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com