Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:11 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:29 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:28 am
Posts: 35
Location: United States
I have been pouring over this site for quite some time now, so I am kinda embaressed to be posting for the first time for a screw up. Long story short, my bridge plate is too far back for my scale length. If I put my bridge pins in I will be drilling through my x-brace. Can I use a pinless bridge to compensate or should I rip the top off and start over? As it is the saddle will be less than half an inch from the X. I need some good news, I was hoping to have a couple of coats of finish on before the wife gets home sunday, but I guess the more you screw up the more you learn on your first build. Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:06 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 3:25 am
Posts: 3788
Location: Russellville, Arkansas
Can I use a pinless bridge to compensate?

Yep.

_________________
http://www.dickeyguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:10 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:28 am
Posts: 35
Location: United States
Thanks Bruce! Ive been outside checking to see what tops I have to start over. You just made my day-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:16 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:09 am
Posts: 841
Location: Auburn, California
First name: Hank
Last Name: Mauel
City: Auburn
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 95603
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Like Bruce said, go for a pinless bridge with either the small studs that the ball ends fit over or the style (like Lowden) where the strings feed through holes at the back of the bridge and the ball ends rest against that edge...like a classical without the tied on strings.
You didn't say, but is this your first try at building?
If so, with the bridge that far up and straddling the lower X brace legs that close to the X intersection, you will probably have a fairly "stiff" top as it relates to the string energy driving the top. It will be interesting to hear what volume/tone you get from this arrangement vis a vis your interior top bracing architecture. Worst case, if it doesn't perform to your expectations, is to re-top it later. That will give you some "repair" experience and allow you to compare volume/tone with a more "conventionally" placed bridge location.
Count it as a learning experience. [:Y:]

_________________
Hank Mauel


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:20 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 3390
Location: Alexandria MN
Well one thing you could do is put a light inside the guitar, darken the room, and mark the front edge of the bridge plate on the top. Then figure out if you could use a longer scale length or maybe a 12 fret neck and make a new neck. I have no idea if a pinless bridge would work. Might not be supported very well if the plate is way back.
I had one guitar come in that had all the pin holes drilled through the x brace completely missing the bridge plate. That guy built the body with 12 fret plans but then used a 14 fret neck.
Terry

_________________
It's not what you don't know that hurts you, it's what you do know that's wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:29 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:28 am
Posts: 35
Location: United States
Yes, this is my first build. I have been doing repairs on it the entire time, I am getting quite good. I have screwed up everyway imaginable. I am making an OM-started off with deeper body and an oversized soundhole. I braced it up and never thought about the scale length until I was reading on the forum today about compensating and intonating the saddle. I thought I only had some light sanding, building of my bridge and be done. Ha Ha! Thats a good idea about the light except I have my fingerboard over at Lavins for some inlay work. This is a tribute for my grandad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:30 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 2060
I have to voice my dissent, in that I think going with a pinless bridge would be quite a bad idea. The X and plate aren't positioned strictly to dodge the bridge pins, but actually have some tonal and structural sense in their location.

If you want to treat it as an experiment with full acceptance that you may have to rip off the top and redo it as Hank mentioned, then go right ahead. If it were me I would either make a new neck to fit the bracing, or retop it.

_________________
Eschew obfuscation, espouse elucidation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:42 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 am
Posts: 1271
Given the info at hand, I'd have to disagree with going ahead with a pinless bridge. If you haven't started finishing yet, you're in a pretty good spot to remove the top, and rebrace it. If your saddle is only 1/2" from the intersection of the X, I doubt you will end up with a good sounding guitar (although I can't say I've built one that way to know ;) ). With the X that close and the bridge patch that far south, you are going to end up top that wont do a lot of pumping.

Finishing is still a big job ahead of you plus designing and building a pinless bridge. I think you'd be throwing good money after bad.

Is the neck built? If not, you could think about going with a 12 or 13 fret neck too.

_________________
http://www.chassonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:43 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:28 am
Posts: 35
Location: United States
thanks, David--right when I was getting excited about not having to rip the top off. I really dont want to rip it off after Ive finished it, so its off to the shop I go tail between my legs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:43 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 am
Posts: 1271
David, you beat me to it!

_________________
http://www.chassonguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:48 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:05 pm
Posts: 3350
Location: Bakersville, NC
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Even though I build mainly with pinless bridges, its very important to have the bridge placed in an area where it will not only provide under bridge plate coverage as well as an area that will give you most soundboard movement. I don't thing right over the X will be a good place to place a bridge. If you really don't want to redo the top, maybe you can take some of the others' advise and do a 13 fret neck. It will be the best compromise.

Good luck,

_________________
Peter M.
Cornerstone Guitars
http://www.cornerstoneukes.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:55 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:49 am
Posts: 13391
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
First name: Hesh
Last Name: Breakstone
City: Ann Arbor
State: Michigan
Country: United States
Status: Professional
I'll add my vote to to the idea that the bridge plate must be properly positioned for the bridge, be it pinless or not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:39 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:40 am
Posts: 1900
Location: Spokane, Washington
First name: Pat
Last Name: Foster
State: Eastern WA
Focus: Build
There IS a bright side to this: you caught it before you put on a pin bridge and drilled bridge pin holes through your x-bracing.

_________________
now known around here as Pat Foster
_________________
http://www.patfosterguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:16 am
Posts: 2244
Location: United States
First name: michael
Last Name: mcclain
City: pendleton
State: sc
Zip/Postal Code: 29670
Status: Professional
i would agree with those that advise not to put the bridge too close to the x-brace joint.

this would also be the time to sit back and analyse how this situation arose; did you diverge from the ;lan in one aspect and fail to compensate in another, and so on. by doing so you should help yourself to avoid such situations in the future.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:07 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:49 pm
Posts: 1209
Location: Ukiah, CA
If it's a tribute, I wouldn't make it an experiment. But, if the inlay hasn't begun you might get it back, take off the fretboard and add a zero fret to a new fretboard. That would buy you a little space. Otherwise I would take off the top and do it again. It's just another repair.

_________________
Ken Franklin
clumsy yet persistent
https://www.kenfranklinukulele.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:00 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:16 am
Posts: 2692
Sounds as if your bracing is waaay off. If you go ahead with pinless, the likelihood is that it will sound awful and self-destruct. Put a new top on it.

_________________
Howard Klepper
http://www.klepperguitars.com

When all else fails, clean the shop.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kyle.medeiros and 72 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com