Howard Klepper wrote:
Did Michael actually tell you that this guitar needs a new top, bridge, and frets?
[For those of you who don't know, Michael is one of the very best in the business]
I took this guitar to Michael Lewis about 15 months ago. At that time it had one crack in the top. That crack had been there for a number of years and he felt it was stable. He felt a few of the braces needed attention and it needed frets. I was not in a position to have the work done (I actually went there for a little warranty work on a Martin and brought this guitar along to have it assessed).
Fast forward 12 months...I was ready to have the work done. Upon pulling the guitar from its case I noted all the new cracks.
I called Michael and he was very concerned, particularly about the crack at the fingerboard. I forgot to mention in my original post (but told Michael) that the glue where the fingerboard meets the top has some whitening as if the glue is being stressed.
At that point I just wrote off the guitar assuming the only fix was a new top.
As for the bridge, if it is getting a new top shouldn't it have a new bridge? This bridge has been a pain...I've had the string grooves in front of the pins filled twice as the small strings chewed into it over the years. The sharp edges were causing the strings to break behind the saddle.
I've made arrangements to have it assessed by a luthier and will go with his expert opinion.
I find it interesting the desire expressed to preserve the 40 year old top. To me it's beat to snot and is ready for the woodpile. This is probably why I'm not a luthier.
You folks are the experts and I'll be sure to have an expert reassess it.
I thank you for you input.