Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Dec 01, 2024 7:26 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:32 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 19
First name: J
Last Name: Ebinly
Hey guys,

Would anyone happen to have a good mechanical drawing of Gibson’s 57 Classic Plus pickup? Having pre-purchase specs such as general measurements and string spacing would be great. And, yes, we have already contacted Gibson.
While we’re on the topic, does anyone really know what the greatest contributing factor is which allows a Gibson to sound like a Gibson? Would you say it’s mostly due to wood type/selection, body shape, electronics, or string height at the bridge? Or, maybe, a combo of?

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:01 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:43 am
Posts: 1326
Location: chicagoland, illinois
City: chicagoland
State: illinois
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Quote:
does anyone really know what the greatest contributing factor is which allows a Gibson to sound like a Gibson? Would you say it’s mostly due to wood type/selection, body shape, electronics, or string height at the bridge?


i'd say the greatest factors in a solidbody gibson might be mahogany neck material and low to medium-output humbucking pickups.
other contributors would be scale length, mahogany body, and tilted/archtop style geometry, as opposed to "flatmount" fender style.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:47 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:12 am
Posts: 81
First name: Brian
Last Name: Johnston
City: Sudbury
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: P3A 6C1
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Like the above poster, I'm sure its a combination of the factors... and I hear a lot of people talking about the mahogany body having a lot to do with it (mahogany being associated with a dark, rich tone).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:10 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 19
First name: J
Last Name: Ebinly
Would you go as far as saying a "flatmount" Gibson-style custom could sound very close to current production Gibson's?

The reason I'm asking is that it's much easier to rout a zero-degree N-pocket, and we actually kind of dig the “flatmount” look as opposed to Gibbie’s current 5-degree N-angle – especially since we’re planning on using a spoke-style truss-rod.

The other option would be to simply raise the fretboard up off the body about 4mm in order to mimic Gibson’s body-to-string height at the bridge measurement.

Any views/opinions/experience regarding?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:24 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 1170
First name: Rodger
Last Name: Knox
City: Baltimore
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21234
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
My opinion is that pickups are 90% of the sound, and most people can't hear the 10% that's different.
Yes, you can get the Gibson sound without the neck angle, but routing an angle into the neck pocket is as simple as putting a shim under the end of your neck pocket template.

_________________
A man hears what he wants to hear, and disreguards the rest. Paul Simon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:45 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 8:35 pm
Posts: 2660
Location: Austin, Texas
First name: Dan
Last Name: Smith
City: Round Rock
State: TX
Zip/Postal Code: 78681
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Rodger Knox wrote:
My opinion is that pickups are 90% of the sound, and most people can't hear the 10% that's different.
Yes, you can get the Gibson sound without the neck angle, but routing an angle into the neck pocket is as simple as putting a shim under the end of your neck pocket template.

Yep, much easier than putting the neck angle on the neck. I'm not comfortable playing a straight neck guitar.
I use a 2-3 degree angle depending on the bridge height.

_________________
wah
Wah-wah-wah-wah
Wah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:35 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 19
First name: J
Last Name: Ebinly
Quote:
Yep, much easier than putting the neck angle on the neck. I'm not comfortable playing a straight neck guitar.
I use a 2-3 degree angle depending on the bridge height.


What router bit do you use to rout the pocket, and do you leave the corners round, or square then off with a chisel?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:02 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:31 pm
Posts: 1682
First name: Kevin
Last Name: Looker
City: Worthington
State: OH
Zip/Postal Code: 43085
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
A regular old straight bit works fine - as long as it's sharp. You need to take multiple passes, don't try to take it all out at once.

You can square up the pocket or round the corners on the neck tenon. Don't think it makes any difference since it's covered by the fingerboard. I guess you would gain a little more gluing surface if you square up the pocket but don't think it would be significant.

Kevin Looker

_________________
I'm not a luthier.
I'm just a guy who builds guitars in his basement.
It's better than playing golf.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 57 Classic Plus
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:13 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 1170
First name: Rodger
Last Name: Knox
City: Baltimore
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21234
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I use a 1/2" straight cut pattern bit, but I use fostner bits and a chisel to remove most of the material.
Attachment:
IMGP1717.JPG

Attachment:
IMGP1726.JPG

Attachment:
IMGP1745.JPG

As for rounding the corners, sometimes I do and sometimes I square them up. One's about as easy as the other, so I do whatever I think will look best.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
A man hears what he wants to hear, and disreguards the rest. Paul Simon


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com